Lossy vs Lossless Compression
Lossless compression reduces file size without removing any data — the original can be perfectly reconstructed from the compressed file. PNG uses lossless compression.
Lossy compression achieves smaller file sizes by permanently discarding data the algorithm determines is least perceptible to the human eye. JPEG and WebP (in lossy mode) use lossy compression. Once compressed, the discarded data cannot be recovered.
JPEG — Best for Photographs
JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) was designed for photographs with continuous tonal variations. It works by applying the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to blocks of 8×8 pixels, then discarding high-frequency detail.
At high quality settings (85–95), JPEG files look nearly identical to the original. At lower settings (50–75), compression artifacts — blocky patterns around edges — become visible.
JPEG does not support transparency. Use PNG or WebP when you need a transparent background.
PNG — Best for Graphics & UI
PNG (Portable Network Graphics) uses DEFLATE lossless compression. Because nothing is discarded, PNG preserves every pixel exactly. This makes it ideal for logos, icons, screenshots, and any image with sharp edges or text.
PNG supports full alpha transparency. However, PNG files are significantly larger than JPEG for photographic content.
WebP — The Modern Choice
WebP was developed by Google and supports both lossy and lossless compression. Lossy WebP typically produces files 25–35% smaller than equivalent JPEG at similar quality. Lossless WebP is typically 26% smaller than PNG.
WebP also supports transparency (like PNG) and animation (like GIF). It is supported by all modern browsers. For new web projects, WebP is generally the best choice for most images.
Choosing a Quality Level
For JPEG and lossy WebP, quality is a dial between file size and visual fidelity. A quality setting of 75–85 is a good starting point for most web images — visually excellent and meaningfully smaller than the original. For hero images where quality is critical, 85–92 is reasonable. For thumbnails and secondary images, 60–75 saves significant bandwidth.